Cem Ilkel vs Liam Broady Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs L. Broady

Cem Ilkel

TUR

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

586

C. Rank

310

144

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

$1.0M

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Liam Broady

GBR

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

586

C. Rank

310

144

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

$1.0M

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 2 Broady

They have played 7 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Liam Broady winning 5. The last match between Liam Broady and Cem Ilkel was at the Nottingham Challenger, 05-01-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ilkel	1
Broady	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Nottingham Challenger(01-05-25)

Stats

Liam Broady

Cem Ilkel

(QF) Bergamo Challenger(11-05-21)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

Liam Broady

(SF) Potchefstroom 1 Challenger(02-13-21)

Stats

Liam Broady

Cem Ilkel

C. Ilkel vs L. Broady H2H Profile

C. Ilkel	Stats	L. Broady
$225,530	Career Prize Money	$1,004,050
56.52% (438-337)	Career Total W/L	58.71% (536-377)
0	Hard	1
1	Indoor	1
7	Titles	13
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Ilkel vs L. Broady Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 67.50% of points on their second serve, while Liam Broady has won 43.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 45.90% of their opponent's second serve points, while Liam Broady has won 40.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 14.43% and 23.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Liam Broady has saved 48.50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 30/12), with Liam Broady winning 74.39% (W/L 61/21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Liam Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 282/164), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 33/58).
Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9), where as Liam Broady has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.71% of matches (W/L 53/17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 1 times and Liam Broady being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Liam Broady winning 5.
The last match between Cem Ilkel and Liam Broady was at the Nottingham Challenger, 05-01-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:56.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 424.21 while Liam Broady has played against players with an average rank of 387.05.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Liam Broady has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 12.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Liam Broady has converted 29.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cem Ilkel vs Liam Broady Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Ilkel vs L. Broady H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Ilkel	Stats	L. Broady
1	H2H Matches Won	2
2	Sets Won	5
30	Games Won	37
10	Aces (Total)	15
9	Total Double Faults	11
1:39:56	Average Match Time	1:39:56
63% (139/222)	1st Serve %	66% (141/213)
65% (91/139)	1st Serve Win %	75% (106/141)
48% (40/83)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (36/72)
42% (5/12)	Break Pts Won %	40% (8/20)
33% (71/213)	Return Points Win %	41% (91/222)
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chisinau Challenger - 26-05-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
R1 Mukund SasikumarM. Sasikumar	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tbilisi Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Giles HusseyG. Hussey	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
M25 Tbilisi - 12-05-2025
R1 Evgeny KarlovskiyE. Karlovskiy	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Sharm ElSheikh - 21-04-2025
SF Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

L. Broady Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Lyon Challenger - 10-11-2025
F Jan-Lennard StruffJ. Struff	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
SF Tom ParisT. Paris	W	7-6(5) 6-4	Stats
QF Matej DodigM. Dodig	W	6-3 2-6 6-4	Stats
R2 Yannick HanfmannY. Hanfmann	W	7-6(5) 6-4	Stats
R1 Francesco PassaroF. Passaro	W	6-3 7-5	Stats

View All

C. Ilkel vs L. Broady Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Ilkel	Stats	L. Broady
56.52% (438/337)	YTD Win/Loss	58.71% (536/377)
54.63% (979/813)	Sets Win/Loss	57.14% (1204/903)
51.54% (8791/8267)	Games Win/Loss	53.00% (10506/9317)
61.41% (288/181)	Hard Win/Loss	63.23% (282/164)
44.53% (57/71)	Clay Win/Loss	54.93% (78/64)
54.76% (92/76)	Indoor Hard W/L	61.11% (143/91)
10.00% (1/9)	Grass Win/Loss	36.26% (33/58)
0.34	Aces Per Game	0.26
2865	Aces Total	2489
0.17	Double Faults Per Game	0.16
1385	Total Double Faults	1589
1:15:9	Average Match Time	1:14:25
560.68	Average Opponent Rank	514.89
58% (24152/41308)	1st Serve %	63% (30452/48438)
70% (16999/24152)	1st Serve Win %	68% (20795/30452)
51% (8757/17156)	2nd Serve Win %	52% (9400/17979)
40% (1622/4023)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (2056/4772)
39% (16247/41803)	Return Points Win %	40% (19165/48080)
31.82% (7/15)	Slam W/L	47.27% (26/29)
66.67% (2/1)	Masters W/L	56.25% (9/7)
31.82% (7/15)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
17.86% (5/23)	Main Tour W/L	45.98% (40/47)
52.23% (176/161)	Challenger W/L	56.01% (233/183)
66.39% (241/122)	Futures W/L	67.46% (226/109)
56% (426/756)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (524/884)
40% (4/10)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	35% (6/17)
53% (147/275)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (139/273)
56% (130/233)	Deciding Set Win %	53% (142/270)
85% (424/362)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (525/459)
14% (424/60)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (525/65)
21% (350/74)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (385/76)